Bible Commentary

Leviticus 11:19

Leviticus 11:19

John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible · John Gill (1697–1771) · Public Domain

And the stork,..... A bird of passage, it has its name from kindness, which it exercises both to its dam, and to its young. Various writers speak of the kindness of these birds to their dams, which when they are old they take care of and feed them, to which the apostle is thought to allude, and its tenderness to its young is no less manifest: when the city of Delf in Holland was on fire, the storks were seen very busy to save their young from the flames, and which when they could not do, threw themselves into the midst of them, and perished with them, as Drusius from the Dutch historians relates.

It is said to feed upon serpents; and hence by Virgil to be "invisa colubris"; and Juvenal says, it nourishes its young with them; and which may be a reason of its being forbid to be eaten, and is the reason given by the Mahometans for the prohibition of it; though on this account it was in great honour in Thessaly, that country being freed from serpents by it, and therefore they made it a capital crime to kill them, as Pliny relates; formerly people would not eat the stork, but at present it is much esteemed for the deliciousness of its flesh the heron after her kind; this bird has its name in Hebrew from its being soon angry, as Aben Ezra observes; and Jarchi calls it the angry vulture or kite, as it is in the Talmud ; and adds, and it appears to me to be what they call the "heron", one sort of which named "asterias", as there is one sort so called by Pliny ; it becomes tame in Egypt, and so well understands the voice of a man, as Aelianus reports, that if anyone by way of reproach calls it a servant or slothful, it is immediately exceeding angry.

There are three kinds of herons, as both Aristotle and Pliny ; and by a learned man of ours , their names are thus given, the criel or dwarf heron, the blue heron, and the bittour; some reckon nineteen:and the lapwing; the upupa or hoopoe; it has its name in Hebrew, according to Jarchi, from its having a double crest; and so Pliny ascribes to it a double or folded crest, and speaks of it as a filthy bird; and, according to Aristotle and Aelian , its nest is chiefly made of human dung, that by the ill smell of it men may be kept from taking its young; and therefore may well be reckoned among impure fowl.

Calmet says, there is no such thing as a lapwing to be seen in any part of England; but there are such as we call so, whether the same bird with this I cannot say:and the bat; a little bird which flies in the night, Aben Ezra says; Kimchi describes it a mouse with wings, which flies in the night, and we sometimes call it the "flitter mouse"; it is a creature between a fowl and a beast; and, as Aristotle says , it partakes of both, and is of neither; and it is the only fowl, as Pliny observes, that has teeth and teats, that brings forth animals, and nourishes them with milk.

It is a creature so very disagreeable, that one would think almost there was no need of a law to forbid the eating of it; and yet it is said by some to be eatable, and to be eaten, as Strabo affirms, yea, to be delicious food.

It is asserted , that there is a sort of them in the east, larger than ordinary, and is salted and eaten--that there are bats in China as large as pullets, and are as delicate eating. Of these several fowls before mentioned, some are of the ravenous kind, and are an emblem of persecutors and covetous persons, and such as live by rapine and violence; others are of a lustful nature, and are an emblem of those who serve various lusts and pleasures, and give up themselves to uncleanness; others are night birds, and are a proper emblem of them whose works are works of darkness, and love darkness rather than the light; and others never rise higher than the earth, and so may denote earthly minded persons; and others live on impure things, and so fitly represent such who live an impure life; with all such the people of God are to have no fellowship.

Aristot. Hist. Animal. l. 9. c. 13. Aelian. de Animal. l. 3. c. 23. & l. 10. c. 16. Plin. Nat. Hist. l. 10. c. 23. Georgic. l. 2. Satyr. 14. Apud Bochart. ut supra, (Hierozoic. par. 2. l. 2.) c. 29. col.

329. Ut supra. (Plin. Nat. Hist. l. 10. c. 23.) Calmet in the word "Stork". T. Bab. Cholin, fol. 63. 1. Ut supra, () c. 60. so Aristot. l. 9. c. 1. De Animal. l. 5. c. 36. Hist. Animal. l. 9. c. 1. Ut supra.

(Plin. Nat. Hist. l. 10. c. 23.) Ainsworth's Dictionary, in voce "Ardea". Nat. Hist. l. 10. c. 29. Hist. Animal. l. 9. c. 15. De Animal. l. 3. c. 26. Dictionary, in the word "Lapwing". Sepher Shorash.

in voc. Plje. De Part. Animal. l. 4. c. 13. Nat. Hist. l. 10. c. 61. l. 11. c. 37. Geograph. l. 16.

The Daily Devotional

One devotional. Every morning.

The full reading, the passage behind it, and where to go deeper — in your inbox before the day starts. No ads, ever.

We'll send one email to confirm it's really you. Unsubscribe in one tap, any time.

Continue tomorrow

Turn Bible study into a daily habit

Read today's devotional, save your progress, and receive a gentle daily reminder.

Recommended reading

More for Leviticus 11:19

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

Leviticus 11 — OverviewLeviticus 11 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleThe ceremonial law is described by the apostle (Heb. ix. 9, 10) to consist, not only "in gifts and sacrifices," which hitherto have been treated of in this book, but "in meats, and drinks, and divers washings"…Leviticus 11 — OverviewLeviticus 11 · Treasury of Scripture KnowledgeLeviticus 11:1, What beasts may; Leviticus 11:4, and what may not be eaten; Leviticus 11:9, What fishes; Leviticus 11:13, What fowls; Leviticus 11:29, The creeping things which are unclean.Leviticus 11 — OverviewLeviticus 11 · John Gill's Exposition of the Entire BibleThis chapter treats of creatures clean and unclean, as fit or not fit to be eaten; and first of beasts, whose signs are given, Le 11:1 then of fishes, which are likewise described, Le 11:9 after that of fowls, and those…Leviticus 11:1-47Leviticus 11:1-47 · The Pulpit CommentaryPART III UNCLEANNESS, CEREMONIAL AND MORAL: ITS REMOVAL OR ITS PUNISHMENT SECTION I EXPOSITION THE two preceding parts having made manifest the way of approach to God by means of sacrifice and the appointed…Leviticus 11:9-19Leviticus 11:9-19 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleHere is, 1. A general rule concerning fishes, which were clean and which not. All that had fins and scales they might eat, and only those odd sorts of water-animals that have not were forbidden, v. 9, 10. The…Leviticus 11:13-19Leviticus 11:13-19 · The Pulpit CommentaryThe unclean birds are those which are gross feeders, devourers of flesh or offal, and therefore offensive to the taste, beginning with the eagle and vulture tribe. It is probable that the words translated owl (Leviticus…