Bible Commentary

Deuteronomy 25:7-10

Deuteronomy 25:7-10

The Pulpit Commentary · Joseph S. Exell and contributors · Public Domain

If the man refused to marry the widow of his deceased brother, he was free to do so; but the woman had her redress. She was to bring the matter before the eiders of the town, sitting as magistrates at the gate, and they were to summon the man and speak to him, and if he persisted in his refusal, the woman was to take his shoe from off his foot, and spit before his face, and say, So shall it be done unto that man that will not build up his brother's house. The taking off of the shoe of the man by the woman was an act of indignity to him; it amounted to a declaration that he was not worthy to stand in his brother's place, and was scornfully rejected by the woman herself. As the planting of the shod foot on a piece of property, or the casting of the shoe over a field, was emblematical of taking possession of it with satisfaction (; ); and as the voluntary handing of one's shoe to another betokened the giving up to that other of some property or right; so, contrariwise, the forcible removal from one of his shoe and the casting of it aside indicated contemptuous rejection of the owner, and repudiation of all his rights and claims in the matter. To walk barefooted was regarded by the Jews as ignominious and miserable (cf. , ; 2 Samuel 15:30). The spitting before the face of the man ( בְּפָנַיו in front of him) is by the Jewish interpreters understood of spitting on the ground in his presence. This seems to be what the words express (cf. ; ; ; ; , for the rendering of בפני); and this, according to Oriental notions, would be insult enough (cf. ; ; Niebuhr, ' Description de l'Arabie,' 1.49).

But though the childless widow might thus approach and lay hold on the man, no license was thus granted to women to pass beyond the bounds of decency in their approaches to the other sex. Hence the prohibition in these verses. The severe sentence here prescribed was by the rabbins commuted into a fine of the value of the hand.

The Daily Devotional

One devotional. Every morning.

The full reading, the passage behind it, and where to go deeper — in your inbox before the day starts. No ads, ever.

We'll send one email to confirm it's really you. Unsubscribe in one tap, any time.

Continue tomorrow

Turn Bible study into a daily habit

Read today's devotional, save your progress, and receive a gentle daily reminder.

Recommended reading

More for Deuteronomy 25:7-10

Continue with other commentaries and DiscipleDeck content connected to this verse, chapter, or topic.

Other commentaries

Deuteronomy 25 — OverviewDeuteronomy 25 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleHere is, I. A law to moderate the scourging of malefactors, ver. 1-3. II. A law in favour of the ox that treads out the corn, ver. 4. III. For the disgracing of him that refused to marry his brother's widow,…Deuteronomy 25 — OverviewDeuteronomy 25 · Treasury of Scripture KnowledgeDeuteronomy 25:1, Stripes must not exceed forty; Deuteronomy 25:4, The ox is not to be muzzled; Deuteronomy 25:5, Of raising seed unto a brother; Deuteronomy 25:11, Of the immodest woman; Deuteronomy 25:13, Of unjust…Deuteronomy 25 — OverviewDeuteronomy 25 · John Gill's Exposition of the Entire BibleSeveral laws are contained in this chapter, as concerning beating such whose crimes required it, De 25:1; of not muzzling the ox in treading out the corn, De 25:4; of marrying a deceased brother's wife, when there was…Deuteronomy 25:1-19Deuteronomy 25:1-19 · The Pulpit CommentaryEXPOSITION LAWS RELATING TO CORPORAL PUNISHMENT, LEVIRATE MARRIAGES, AND WEIGHTS AND MEASURES.Deuteronomy 25:5-12Deuteronomy 25:5-12 · Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole BibleHere is, I. The law settled concerning the marrying of the brother's widow. It appears from the story of Judah's family that this had been an ancient usage (Gen. xxxviii. 8), for the keeping up of distinct…Deuteronomy 25:5-10Deuteronomy 25:5-10 · The Pulpit CommentaryLevirate marriages. If a man who was married died without issue, his surviving brother was required to marry the widow, so as to raise up a successor to the deceased, who should be his heir. The brother who refused this…